Public language quality rules

Review Standards

This page explains how ANCHOR glossary and language entries should be reviewed before public use.

Purpose: keep definitions clear, respectful, non-diagnostic, public-facing, Spanish-ready, and useful for real support.

Keep the glossary simple

The glossary defines words. Tools such as Quick Help, Wording Checker, Situation Guide, and Print Cards stay on separate pages.

Write for the person using the service

Start with plain meaning. Add professional meaning only after the everyday explanation is clear.

Separate behavior from interpretation

Describe what happened before guessing intent. Use access, sensory, communication, trauma, health, and system-barrier checks.

Name what helps and what harms

Each major term should give practical support actions and warn against common escalation patterns.

Respect individual language preference

Use autistic person, person with autism, disabled person, or person with a disability according to individual preference and context.

Avoid public developer language

Do not publish build notes, internal version notes, placeholder explanations, or language that talks to the creator instead of the public.

Keep Spanish access human-reviewed

Spanish entries should use plain explanations, not only direct word-for-word translation. Interpreter notes should be added where a term is culturally or clinically difficult.

Do not turn language into diagnosis

Definitions can explain concepts and support needs, but they do not diagnose, determine eligibility, or replace legal or medical advice.

Review status

Community reviewed

Useful for lived-experience accuracy, clarity, and harm reduction.

Review status

Professional reviewed

Useful for education, healthcare, legal, policy, and agency language.

Review status

Spanish reviewed

Useful for bilingual access, interpreter wording, and family-facing materials.